Supplier contract review
You receive a contract, you must identify deviations from the standard, spot sensitive clauses, propose alternative wording. Today: 90 min per contract.
Workshop target: ~15 min per contract
Service · workshop · light entry
You pick the process: a repetitive contract review, a supplier brief, an RFP synthesis, an invoice workflow. I open it with you, we deconstruct it, and we rebuild together the AI-augmented version, in your tool, with your data, by the end of the session. If you follow up with the AI Audit, the €950 are fully credited.
Why a workshop
Many AI workshops end up as a nice demo with a generic tool, and nothing happens next. Mine starts from the opposite: we take ONE process from your daily work (not an abstract example), we deconstruct it, and we build the AI-augmented version in your tool, with your data, in session.
By the 90th minute, you (or a colleague) test the improved process on a real case. If it doesn't work, we fix it before you leave. This is the opposite of a PoC that sleeps: it is an operational process the same evening.
Examples · processes we can take
Here are the six most frequent examples, picked by clients from January to May 2026. Yours doesn't need to be on this list: if it's a recurring process that costs you time, it qualifies.
You receive a contract, you must identify deviations from the standard, spot sensitive clauses, propose alternative wording. Today: 90 min per contract.
Workshop target: ~15 min per contract
5 suppliers responded to your 40-page RFP. You must produce a defensible comparison table. Today: 2 days.
Workshop target: ~2 h
Before a supplier meeting, you want a brief: positions, leverage, BATNA, anticipations. Today: depends on the week.
Workshop target: ~20 min
Each month, X hundreds of non-PO invoices to classify, verify, escalate. Today: accounting time + follow-ups.
Workshop target: 70% automated
You want to quickly understand a category structure (suppliers, spend, trends). Today: you ask the data team.
Workshop target: ~30 min in autonomy
You know buyers use ChatGPT in "shadow IT" mode. You want to frame it without breaking it. Today: no framework.
Workshop target: 3-page charter ready
The workshop · minute by minute
No intro slides. We enter your process by minute 6, build until minute 80, test, and ship.
You describe the process as it exists today. I restate in short feedback loops. We agree on the exact scope and the 'successful' version we aim for at the end.
We slice the steps, identify frictions, isolate what is repetitive (AI candidate) and what requires judgement (keep human). You show me your real inputs (a contract, a brief, an invoice…).
We build the improved process in your tool (Claude, ChatGPT, Notion, Slack, Excel, your choice). At each iteration, you take over: you prompt, I guide. The output must be usable by you tomorrow, not just presentable.
We launch the improved process on a real case from your daily work. We observe the result, we adjust if needed. If it doesn't work, we fix it before leaving.
I write the 1-page memo the same evening: what we saw, what works, what remains (internal training, security, follow-up). Sent within 24 h.
Who comes · client side
Alone is heavy. Beyond 4, the session becomes a group workshop and loses intensity. Ideal ratio: you (process owner) + 1 or 2 people who run the process daily.
The one who decides, validates, and will carry what comes next. You give the business context, the goal, the constraints.
The one who knows the operational reality, the exceptions, the edge cases. Without them, we build theoretical.
Useful if your company already has AI usage rules or integrations to respect. Optional otherwise.
And after · if you want to go further
Many clients take the Workshop first to test my method, then move on to the AI Audit to frame a full 12-month trajectory. If you decide within 90 days, the €950 are fully deducted.
One process improved with AI, in your tool, in session.
→ credited on the AI AuditInterviews CPO/CFO/AP/IT/business, quantified ROI, augmented-buyer vision, 12-month roadmap.
−€950 appliedFor you · not for you
✓ For you if…
× Not for you if…
FAQ
A training is designed to transfer a method to a group. The Workshop is designed to improve a concrete process on your case, with your data, by the end of the hour. It is co-construction, not pedagogical transfer.
If you want to train 8 to 15 buyers, look at the AI × procurement training page. If you want to solve a precise operational problem, it is the Workshop.
If you sign an AI Audit within the 90 days that follow the Workshop, the €950 ex. VAT you paid are fully deducted from the Audit invoice. Beyond 90 days, the Workshop stays an independent service.
No, we can run the session on my environment (Claude Pro), and the final memo includes a tool recommendation for your context. But the ideal goal stays building IN your tool, that is what makes the process deployable the next day.
It happens, about 1 case in 10. In that case, the final memo explains why (judgement too dominant, data not exploitable, security). We lost 90 min, but we gained a clarity nobody else gives you honestly. The Workshop is still invoiced.
Remote by default (Google Meet, Teams, Zoom, screen-shared). On-site possible in Paris (travel fees outside Île-de-France). Remote is often more effective because each participant stays in their real work environment.
The Workshop is invoiced as consulting (not training). Therefore not OPCO-eligible. Invoiced as standard professional expense. Procurementor is a French company, invoices in EUR ex. VAT (20% VAT).
On the booking form, you indicate in 2 lines the process you want to work on. I confirm or propose a framing call before the session.