🇫🇷🇬🇧 Score your procurement vs. a sector benchmark, free, no emailTake the assessment

Service · workshop · light entry

One process from your daily work. 90 minutes to see how AI can improve it.

You pick the process: a repetitive contract review, a supplier brief, an RFP synthesis, an invoice workflow. I open it with you, we deconstruct it, and we rebuild together the AI-augmented version, in your tool, with your data, by the end of the session. If you follow up with the AI Audit, the €950 are fully credited.

90 minutes · remote or on-siteYou + 1–2 colleagues€950 · 100% credited on the Audit

Why a workshop

No PoC that sleeps. A process that works by the end of the hour.

Many AI workshops end up as a nice demo with a generic tool, and nothing happens next. Mine starts from the opposite: we take ONE process from your daily work (not an abstract example), we deconstruct it, and we build the AI-augmented version in your tool, with your data, in session.

By the 90th minute, you (or a colleague) test the improved process on a real case. If it doesn't work, we fix it before you leave. This is the opposite of a PoC that sleeps: it is an operational process the same evening.

Examples · processes we can take

You come with one process. Which one?

Here are the six most frequent examples, picked by clients from January to May 2026. Yours doesn't need to be on this list: if it's a recurring process that costs you time, it qualifies.

Contracts

Supplier contract review

You receive a contract, you must identify deviations from the standard, spot sensitive clauses, propose alternative wording. Today: 90 min per contract.

Workshop target: ~15 min per contract

RFP / RFI

Supplier response synthesis

5 suppliers responded to your 40-page RFP. You must produce a defensible comparison table. Today: 2 days.

Workshop target: ~2 h

Negotiation

Negotiation brief prep

Before a supplier meeting, you want a brief: positions, leverage, BATNA, anticipations. Today: depends on the week.

Workshop target: ~20 min

Invoice / AP

Non-PO invoice validation

Each month, X hundreds of non-PO invoices to classify, verify, escalate. Today: accounting time + follow-ups.

Workshop target: 70% automated

Spend

Category mapping

You want to quickly understand a category structure (suppliers, spend, trends). Today: you ask the data team.

Workshop target: ~30 min in autonomy

Governance

AI usage charter for your team

You know buyers use ChatGPT in "shadow IT" mode. You want to frame it without breaking it. Today: no framework.

Workshop target: 3-page charter ready

The workshop · minute by minute

What happens during the 90 minutes.

No intro slides. We enter your process by minute 6, build until minute 80, test, and ship.

  1. 00 – 05 min

    Process restatement

    You describe the process as it exists today. I restate in short feedback loops. We agree on the exact scope and the 'successful' version we aim for at the end.

  2. 05 – 25 min

    Deconstruction of the current process

    We slice the steps, identify frictions, isolate what is repetitive (AI candidate) and what requires judgement (keep human). You show me your real inputs (a contract, a brief, an invoice…).

  3. 25 – 70 min

    Building the augmented version

    We build the improved process in your tool (Claude, ChatGPT, Notion, Slack, Excel, your choice). At each iteration, you take over: you prompt, I guide. The output must be usable by you tomorrow, not just presentable.

  4. 70 – 85 min

    Real-conditions test

    We launch the improved process on a real case from your daily work. We observe the result, we adjust if needed. If it doesn't work, we fix it before leaving.

  5. 85 – 90 min

    Memo + who does what

    I write the 1-page memo the same evening: what we saw, what works, what remains (internal training, security, follow-up). Sent within 24 h.

Who comes · client side

2 to 3 people on the client side. No more.

Alone is heavy. Beyond 4, the session becomes a group workshop and loses intensity. Ideal ratio: you (process owner) + 1 or 2 people who run the process daily.

Profile 1 · mandatory
You, process owner

The one who decides, validates, and will carry what comes next. You give the business context, the goal, the constraints.

Profile 2 · mandatory
A buyer who runs this process

The one who knows the operational reality, the exceptions, the edge cases. Without them, we build theoretical.

Profile 3 · optional
An IT or data lead (if AI already deployed)

Useful if your company already has AI usage rules or integrations to respect. Optional otherwise.

And after · if you want to go further

The Workshop is credited on the AI Audit.

Many clients take the Workshop first to test my method, then move on to the AI Audit to frame a full 12-month trajectory. If you decide within 90 days, the €950 are fully deducted.

You are here
Workshop · 90 min
€950ex. VAT

One process improved with AI, in your tool, in session.

→ credited on the AI Audit
→ within 90 days
Next step · if relevant
Procurement AI Audit · 3–4 wks
€9,999ex. VAT

Interviews CPO/CFO/AP/IT/business, quantified ROI, augmented-buyer vision, 12-month roadmap.

−€950 applied

For you · not for you

Honesty before booking.

✓ For you if…

You have one specific process that costs you time every week

  • You can identify ONE precise process (not 'improve procurement' in general).
  • You (or a colleague) run this process daily and can bring it to the table.
  • You're ready to spend time IN the tool during the session, not just watch.
  • You want to test my method before committing to the AI Audit.
  • You have access to at least one AI tool internally (Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot…) or are ready to enable one.

× Not for you if…

You are looking for a generic AI demo or a disguised audit

  • You want to 'discover AI' without a concrete case in mind.
  • You expect a deliverable defensible to the steering committee, that is the Audit.
  • You want 8 people in the room, beyond 3 or 4, the session loses density; take the AI procurement training instead.
  • You want to frame a 12-month trajectory, that is the Audit, not the Workshop.
  • Your IT blocks all external LLMs, let us discuss first to see if we can work locally or via a proxy.

FAQ

Frequent questions.

What is the difference with an AI procurement training?

A training is designed to transfer a method to a group. The Workshop is designed to improve a concrete process on your case, with your data, by the end of the hour. It is co-construction, not pedagogical transfer.

If you want to train 8 to 15 buyers, look at the AI × procurement training page. If you want to solve a precise operational problem, it is the Workshop.

How does the €950 credit on the Audit work?

If you sign an AI Audit within the 90 days that follow the Workshop, the €950 ex. VAT you paid are fully deducted from the Audit invoice. Beyond 90 days, the Workshop stays an independent service.

I do not have an internal AI tool. Is that blocking?

No, we can run the session on my environment (Claude Pro), and the final memo includes a tool recommendation for your context. But the ideal goal stays building IN your tool, that is what makes the process deployable the next day.

And if we discover during the Workshop that the process is not a good AI candidate?

It happens, about 1 case in 10. In that case, the final memo explains why (judgement too dominant, data not exploitable, security). We lost 90 min, but we gained a clarity nobody else gives you honestly. The Workshop is still invoiced.

Remote or on-site?

Remote by default (Google Meet, Teams, Zoom, screen-shared). On-site possible in Paris (travel fees outside Île-de-France). Remote is often more effective because each participant stays in their real work environment.

Can you invoice via OPCO or as professional training?

The Workshop is invoiced as consulting (not training). Therefore not OPCO-eligible. Invoiced as standard professional expense. Procurementor is a French company, invoices in EUR ex. VAT (20% VAT).

You know which process you want to take? Let's book 90 min.

On the booking form, you indicate in 2 lines the process you want to work on. I confirm or propose a framing call before the session.