Strategic sourcing · Sourcing line
I help you reduce your costs by launching the RFP you do not have time to run. In 10 days, so the decision at the end is the right one.
RFPs of €0.5-5M, indirect spend, companies above €50M revenue. Savings, but not only: a tightened need, innovation captured from suppliers, risk transferred, a decision your board can defend.
Guaranteed: ready to launch in 10 days, or I keep working at no extra cost.
Why this offer exists
At Amazon it was. Data, tools, time. More than €150M a year on my categories. Business and finance teams working with us rather than after us. Savings, innovation, sustainability.
Then I left. And I found that in smaller organizations that machinery was rarely in place. Understaffed teams when they existed at all. Everything by hand.
The opportunities, everyone could see them. Nobody had the time. Launching a tender took so much work that it kept getting pushed back. Then it was left to slide. The contract renewed itself. Three more years with a supplier never challenged.
"We will do it next time."
On a spend of €1-5M, roughly 10% walks away with that contract. €100-500K.
So I stopped waiting for it to change on its own. I spent most of 2026 driving down the cost of this method. What took three months now fits in ten days.
What that changes is not for me.
Mid-market companies equipped with the artillery of large groups, adapted to their stakes and their constraints.
Start small, scale on proof
No transformation programme at the first meeting. We work together on one tender, it proves itself. Then, if you want, the method extends.
The RFP Launch: your stuck tender, launched in 10 days, steered to a mastered decision. This is where we start, and where we prove things.
The "3 RFPs per quarter" sprint, category strategy: the method extended to where the rest of the margin sleeps, with your teams on board.
Turnkey RFx, full programme, AI adoption: the procurement function scaled up, with your teams at the controls.
The Procurementor method
The standard of large groups, compressed into 10 days for a company your size. Everything is decided before the send: the need challenged, the baseline clean, the grid frozen before the bids open.
Make people talkWhere savings are born
Sponsor framing: objectives, scope, calendar. Then stakeholder interviews: the need collected and challenged, the real need separated from comfort. The savings sleep in the spec, rarely in the sticker price. No AI here: pure craft.
The real need separated from comfort: the first source of savings.
Reveal
Your scattered data rebuilt into an operational baseline, confronted with a market should-cost. No point hoping for 10% if the market says 2%. Without a baseline, no offer can be compared.
A realistic savings target, calibrated on the market.
Converge
A shared vision emerges across departments: everyone states their need, everyone ends up wanting the same deal. The deal is shaped end to end, effective and efficient, the risk moved to the supplier side.
Every department behind a single deal.
DeliverDay 10 · guaranteed
The deliverable: your RFP launched in 10 days. Complete file, reviewed together, then sent, the evaluation grid frozen before the first offer. This is where the guarantee lives: if it is not ready in 10 days, I keep working at no extra cost.
Your RFP sent, bids finally comparable.
Steer
When the offers come in, you know how to compare them. Steering the RFP through to the recommendation: a choice understood and controlled, with its impacts and, where needed, its change management identified.
A recommendation you can defend in front of your board.
Drive adoptionExtension · beyond the base · if needed
Triggered by movement 05. In direct procurement, the nomenclature forces the change. In indirect, only adoption does. When the identified impacts call for it, change management is added as a module.
Savings that outlive the signature.
The offer in detail
What you receive
The prerequisites, said upfront
A prerequisite missing? Scope and price adjust, and I tell you before we start, not during.
€10,000ex. VAT · ready in 10 days
At stake on a €0.5-5M RFP: €50-500K recoverable, first in the definition of the need. The base costs 0.1 to 0.5% of the spend.
Pays for itself at 1% savings on a €1M RFP.
Two guarantees
The conversation first: I tell you whether your RFP is even worth launching. Often the honest answer is no, and it is free.
Ready to launch in 10 days, or I keep working at no extra cost. No success fee. Never billed by the day.
Drawers, depending on your case
Legal contract drafting is excluded.
Not for you if: revenue under €50M, or a full category strategy expected at the base price.
The math, for a CFO or a department leader
Paid back at 1%
On a €1M RFP, the base is covered as soon as savings reach 1%. The target is around 10%.
€10K against €50-500K
The base costs 0.1 to 0.5% of the spend at stake, on an RFP of €0.5-5M.
Signable alone
An amount a department leader commits without building an investment case.
You fund it with the money you were leaving on the table.
Why me
I do not stop until it is delivered and the benefits are evident. A procurement operator who ships code: deep in IT and data, and I negotiate like a buyer. I speak the language of finance, and of the departments across the table: IT, HR, supply chain, production.
Categories I have operated in
Proof
€20M · >20%
The multi-entity maintenance RFP nobody could launch. Pushed back 8 months, unblocked and launched. First round: 27 incomparable bids. Decision frame set, second round reframed, fixed-price model per equipment per year: the risk moved to the supplier side. Over 20% savings. A routine RFP turned strategic.
"I did not know procurement could be this strategic."
A director, at the end of an engagement.
The questions I get
Not by hand. Method first, compressed by a platform I built, hosted in Europe. AI only acts where I can judge its output: assisted drafting, offer analysis, comparison. Judgment, arbitrations and negotiation stay pure craft. The 10 days are a challenge I want to take on with you; what matters is the decision made at the end.
No: messy data is the normal case. The Reveal movement rebuilds it into an operational baseline, confronted with a market should-cost. Nonexistent data is a different scope, and I tell you upfront.
Me. I deliver every engagement myself, directly with your sponsor and your teams. The network of 100+ experts covers niche specialties when needed. And the method stays with you after the engagement.
€10,000 ex. VAT, fixed price. Never billed by the day, no success fee. On a €0.5-5M RFP that is 0.1 to 0.5% of the spend, against €50-500K typically recoverable.
Steering is part of the base: bid reception, comparison on the frozen grid, award recommendation with impacts identified. Then the post-RFP debrief tells you what your tender reveals about the system. If the impacts call for it, adoption and change management are added as a drawer.
Companies above €50M revenue, indirect RFPs of €0.5-5M. Below that, the spend cannot carry an RFP of this size, and I will tell you honestly. The conversation is worth it even if we never work together: often the answer is "do not launch this RFP".
30 minutes. I tell you whether your tender deserves to be launched, and what it could bring back. Often the answer is no, and it costs nothing.